Print Version    Email to Friend
Pro-life leaders block Australian abortion bill

SYDNEY (CNS): Thousands of pro-life supporters gathered for the Stand for Life Rally in Martin Place, Sydney, Australia, on August 20, expressing their opposition to a bill in the New South Wales state parliament that would permit abortion until birth for any reason.
The demonstrators called on members of parliament (MPs) to defeat the Reproductive Health Care Reform Bill that was introduced on August 1. The rally brought together secular pro-life groups and representatives of Catholic, Orthodox and Protestant Churches.
The bill passed the Legislative Assembly, the lower house of the state parliament, on August 8 following a limited three-day period for comment. It is pending in the Legislative Council, the upper house of parliament. 
Legislators had planned to vote on the bill by August 23. However, in response to MPs angry at the lack of due process, New South Wales (NSW) premier, Gladys Berejilkian, announced the vote had been delayed until mid-September. Berejilkian supports the measure.
New South Wales is the only Australian state where abortion remains a criminal offense. It is permitted only when the mother’s physical or mental health is in danger.
Bethany Marsh, a 21-year-old university student and chairperson of LifeChoice Australia, was one of those leading the peaceful but lively August 20 protest. She said that many young women are increasingly opposed to the ideology behind the push for abortion on demand, which pits women against their unborn children.
“The bill, while claiming to be ‘compassionate’, is possibly the most demeaning and inhumane piece of legislation to have ever been considered by the NSW parliament,” she said.
“The presence of hundreds of young women outside parliament should have sent the message, loud and clear, that we, the young pro-life generation, do not want these abhorrent practices,” Marsh said.
Archbishop Anthony Fisher of Sydney, addressed the crowd, saying they were evidence of “people power” and “God power.” He thanked participants for saying “’no’ to a bill that says you can kill babies right up to birth and even after they’re born.”
MP Tanya Davies, a member of the Liberal Party who voted against the bill, said the public deliberately had been shut out of the democratic process.
“Citizens of NSW, you have an equal voice in this debate and up to now the process has been designed to exclude your voice and the voice of your communities,” she told the crowd.
She called for “a tsunami” of opposition to the legislation over the next three weeks.
If enacted, the legislation would further the financial aims of abortion providers, Rachel Carling-Jenkins, CEO of Right To Life NSW, said.
“This is harmful to mothers who, instead of getting the help they need during a crisis, will be automatically be redirected to the cheapest option, i.e., termination of their unborn child,” Carling-Jenkins said, adding, “This bill opens up an opportunity for abortion providers to further profit from women uncertain of their options.”
Tiana Legge, CEO of Women and Babies Support, said the lack of restrictions on abortion in the legislation would make pregnant women even more vulnerable to coerced abortion.
“What we’ve heard from women is that many are pressured and coerced and coercion can take many forms,” Legge said, observing, “It can include a male partner who is using physical or emotional threats and violence against her to coerce her to have an abortion. It can also involve pressure from parents, others close to them or work colleagues and also just a general lack of support.”
In its present form, the bill does not require that women seeking abortion be offered counselling, that babies born alive after failed abortions be rendered medical assistance, or that parental consent be obtained before performing abortions on minors young than 16-years-old. 
It also does not prohibit sex-selective abortion.
The bill mandates, however, that a doctor with a conscientious objection to abortion must refer a woman seeking one to another doctor willing to perform the procedure.
Members of parliament in the lower house sought to have protections for women, babies and medical practitioners added to the legislation, but the amendments were rejected.

More from this section